Prisons
Prisons
To be clear, I've never been in prison (luckily) nor do I have any plans to do so, thus I don't have any eyewitness tales or personal insights to reveal. But I've found it a bit disturbing to read so much recently about life in prisons and the state of our prisons, not only for those people so caught and convicted, but also for those mentally ill and thrown into prison (in the U.S., this is usually a separate prison from the many independent and privatized prisons that house most of the court-convicted). Backing up a bit, a few of my friends have served decades in both law enforcement and in prison management, and they'll be the first to tell you that there are people out there (and some who are now in prison) who are indeed just bad people. Now my friends do have some eyewitness tales of prison life, vicious beatings with one prisoner (a known multiple killer serving a life sentence) pummeling but not killing a fellow prisoner because (as he told my friend) he "didn't feel like it today."
So there's that side, those prisoners there for a reason, having committed a crime against others whether that was robbery or physical harm or just plain bad luck, wrong place, wrong time. But there are also those who just made a mistake and are suddenly thrown in with hardened criminals. One argument says that if you're not a criminal when you enter prison, you will be when you leave. Con games, defending yourself, doing things you'd never do otherwise just to survive. You hear the stories, the gang rapes, the beatings, the guards turning away as you scream for help. This was the case in a story in The New Yorker about a Florida prison for the mentally ill titled Madness. Here's how author Eyal Press described one witnessed scene: One Saturday in June, 2012, Krzykowski (Harriet Krzykowski, a psychiatric technician hired at the Dade Correctional Institution in Florida)
was finishing a shift when she heard that an inmate in the T.C.U. named
Darren Rainey had defecated in his cell and was refusing to clean it up.
He was fifty years old, and, as Krzykowski recalls it, he gave people
unnerving looks, “like he was trying to see inside you.” He had been
convicted of possession of cocaine, and suffered from severe
schizophrenia. “What’s going on with Rainey?” Krzykowski asked a guard. “Oh, don’t worry, we’ll put him in the shower,” he told her. Krzykowski
remembers hearing this and feeling reassured. “I was thinking, O.K.,
lots of times people feel good after a shower, so maybe he will calm
down. A nice, gentle shower with warm water.”...The
next day, Krzykowski learned from some nurses that a couple of guards
had indeed escorted Rainey to the shower at about eight the previous
night. But he hadn’t made it back to his cell. He had collapsed while
the water was running. At 10:07 P.M., he was pronounced dead.
Krzykowski
assumed that he must have had a heart attack or somehow committed
suicide. But the nurses said that Rainey had been locked in a stall
whose water supply was delivered through a hose controlled by the
guards. The water was a hundred and eighty degrees, hot enough to brew a
cup of tea—or, as it soon occurred to Krzykowski, to cook a bowl of
ramen noodles. (Someone had apparently tampered with the T.C.U.’s water
heater.) It was later revealed that Rainey had burns on more than ninety
per cent of his body, and that his skin fell off at the touch...In the days after Rainey’s death, Krzykowski learned from several
inmates in the T.C.U. that Rainey was not the first person who had been
locked in that shower; he was only the first to die there...two of the guards who took Rainey to the shower, including a former
football player named Roland Clarke, were promoted. (Both later
resigned; their files included no indication of wrongdoing.)
But the facts and data are coming in, and here in the U.S. at least, the justice scales seem a bit skewed which possibly accounts for our high incarceration rate. Possession of Crack cocaine (primarily used by blacks) carries much stiffer penalties than does possession of powdered cocaine (primarily used by whites). The populations in prisons is five times more blacks and two time more latinos than whites. And generally, white collar crime (such a banking fraud or tainting prescriptions or other such actions that might have affected hundreds if not thousands of people) generally are punished with a lesser sentence in a "lite" prison, much as that in Finland. Why is that? A Congressman guilty of fraud or embezzling taxpayer's monies gets to have it "easy" in what's now termed a country-club prison with minimal security? Or a dictator is separated and sent into exile (not always with his government's blessing) for fear that he will be killed in prison, despite his possibly giving orders to have many others killed during his reign?
But adds author Hochschild about our prisons in the U.S.: We have so many prisoners that the American unemployment rate for men would be 2 percent higher (and 8 percent higher for black men) if they were all suddenly let out. Our jails are so packed that through the website www.jailbedspace.com wardens and sheriffs can look for space in other facilities if their own is full. Arizona and California have even considered plans to house inmates in Mexico, where costs are lower...The prison boom has also been a chance to make money. One private prison company alone, the Corrections Corporation of America, today runs the country’s fifth-largest prison system, after those of the federal government and the three biggest states. The less money such corporations spend on staff training, food, education, medical care, and rehabilitation, the more profits they make. States, at least in theory, have a financial incentive to reduce recidivism, but for private prisons, recidivism produces what every business wants: returning customers. No wonder these companies push hard for three-strikes laws and similar measures. In 2011, the two biggest private prison firms donated nearly $3 million to political candidates and hired 242 lobbyists around the country. Another industry with a vested interest in keeping prisons full, writes Jeff Smith, is that of food wholesalers, who know that this market of 2.2 million people is powerless to protest if much of the food delivered to them is well past its sell-by date. In 1994, Congress passed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act and the Federal Death Penalty Act, thus adding another 60 offenses considered to be capital crimes which carries the possibility of the death penalty...the law is still on the books.
Throughout the world, there is a divide in how justice is played out. Each county, each court, each judge likely wants to uphold what he or she feels is right even if some might hold different beliefs of what is right or wrong or what does or doesn't work as constructed under the laws on the books. Tough love or rehabilitation, we can carry those same judicial beliefs into parenting and into our schools. It's a difficult question to both answer and to apply universally. But one thing is certain, with a current population of 22% of all prisoners now in U.S. prisons,* this might be the time to search for the right solution....for there IS a problem, but maybe it is outside our prison walls and not within them.
*An interesting peek at the incarceration rate of other countries is available at Wikipedia. Cuba and Thailand maybe...but Belize and England? You just might be surprised...
Comments
Post a Comment
What do YOU think? Good, bad or indifferent, this blog is happy to hear your thoughts...criticisms, corrections and suggestions always welcome.